Legal Opinion

Romero v. Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 13, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00694Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ──────────────────────────────────── EDWIN ROMERO, ET AL., Plaintiffs, 19-cv-0694 (JGK) - against - OPINION AND ORDER METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, ET AL., Defendants. ──────────────────────────────────── JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiffs are current employees of subsidiaries or affiliated entities of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”): the MTA Headquarters (“MTAHQ”) and the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (“MABSTOA”). The plaintiffs bring this action against the defendants,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API