Legal Opinion

United States v. Baez

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 16, 2012No. Criminal Action No. 10-10275-DPWPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, District Judge.

The question presented is whether evidence gathered through a technique authorized by a number of Courts of Appeals — other than the First Circuit which had not addressed the issue — should be suppressed in this arson case because "the Supreme Court held the technique violative of the Fourth Amendment well after the evidentiary initiative used here was completed. I conclude that the exclusionary remedy is not appropriate in these circumstances and will consequently deny the defendant’s motion to suppress.

Defendant Jose Baez has moved to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. AguiarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. BurgosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. WeedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  4. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. United States v. RoseDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API