United States v. Baez
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, District Judge.
The question presented is whether evidence gathered through a technique authorized by a number of Courts of Appeals — other than the First Circuit which had not addressed the issue — should be suppressed in this arson case because "the Supreme Court held the technique violative of the Fourth Amendment well after the evidentiary initiative used here was completed. I conclude that the exclusionary remedy is not appropriate in these circumstances and will consequently deny the defendant’s motion to suppress.
Defendant Jose Baez has moved to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. AguiarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Commonwealth v. BurgosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. WeedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- United States v. RoseDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.