Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose De Los Santos-Himitola, Walber Meza-Navarro, Pedro Guerrero-Grueso, and Alfonso Gonzalez

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 28, 1991No. 90-1434PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Jose De Los Santos Himitola, Walber Meza Navarro, Pedro Guerrero Grueso, and Alfonso Gonzalez (“De Los Santos, et al.”) appeal from a sua sponte order by the district judge declaring them parole ineligible. The three issues now before us are as follows: first, whether the no-parole provisions of the 1986 amendments to 21 U.S.C. §§ 960 & 962 were effective immediately upon the amendments’ enactment on October 27, 1986, or were delayed until November 1, 1987 and, as a result, whether the court is now correct that defendants are ineligible for parole;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. Novenda L. CookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. Stanley FerrymanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Eugene W. Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  2. United States v. BryantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. Armenakes v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  4. United States v. LillyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  5. United States v. Santos-RiosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API