Legal Opinion

Armenakes v. State

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 30, 2003No. 2002-56-C.APublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case came before the court on February 4, 2003, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties, we are satisfied that cause has not been shown. Accordingly, we shall decide the appeal at this time.

The applicant, James G. Armenakes (Armenakes or applicant), is before the Supreme Court on appeal from a judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. Armenakes alleged that his plea of nolo…

3Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. State v. MattatallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mattatall v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. Rodrigues v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. Page v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  4. Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph LiebschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API