Steadfast Insurance Co. v. Caremark Rx, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman
Steadfast Insurance Company (Steadfast) appeals from an order of the circuit court denying its motion for restitution of costs it paid defending Caremark Rx, Inc., and Caremark, Inc., in two underlying federal actions. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the cause for further proceedings.
Caremark Rx, Inc., and its subsidiary, Caremark, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as Caremark), administer prescription drug benefits for health plans throughout the country. In 2001, Steadfast issued a managed care professional liability policy to Caremark.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Buzz Barton & Associates, Inc. v. GiannoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Harrison v. Hardin County Community Unit School District No. 1Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Steadfast Insurance v. Caremark RX, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Caulkins v. PritzkerIllinois Supreme Court · 2023
- American Safety Casualty Insurance v. City of WaukeganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Filliung v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Catom Trucking v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Catom Trucking, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.