Legal Opinion

Gross v. Salzman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the defendant, upon a counterclaim contained in his answer, after a trial by the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The action is to recover rent amounting to $306 alleged to he due, under a written lease, for the month of May, 1908.

The defense was that by reason of the plaintiff’s failure to make certain alterations in the premises, which had been ordered by the Tenement House Department and which the plaintiff was bound to make under the terms of the lease, the rental value of the premises bad been reduced.

The answer also sets up a counterclaim for the recovery of a deposit of $612 made by the defendant upon the execution of the lease.

Upon the trial, it was shown that on or about March 7,' 1907, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. . DriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Anzolone v. PaskuszAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Baylies v. IngramAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Prince v. SchlesingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Sheldon v. TesteraAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Earlington Realty Corp. v. NeschisCity of New York Municipal Court · 1925
  2. Erlenbell v. Sound Realty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  3. Sea Gate Hotel Co. v. NahmmacherCity of New York Municipal Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API