Legal Opinion

Sea Gate Hotel Co. v. Nahmmacher

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 15, 1919Published

Action for rent.

1Opinion of the CourtDoughty, J.

The question arises here as to the force and effect of a judgment in a summary proceeding. This is an action for rent, and the plaintiff’s case rests principally upon the papers in a summary proceeding between the same parties as are now in court, which papers are in evidence in this action.

The petition in the summary proceeding sets forth (among other things) that the landlord and the tenant made an agreement “on or about the 27th day of July, 1917,” whereby “ the said tenant hired from the *316said landlord the said premises before described, for the term of one day and undertook and promised…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Moore v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Jarvis v. . DriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Nemetty v. . NaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API