Sodipo v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DICKENSON, Justice.
The jury convicted Kunlay Sodipo of credit card abuse, 1 and after he entered a plea of “true” to the enhancement allegation, 2 the jury assessed his punishment at confinement for 15 years. We affirm the conviction. 3
There is no challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence as to appellant’s guilt. Appellant presents two points of error. First, he argues that the trial court erred in overruling his request for ten days to prepare for trial as allowed by TEX.CODE CRIM. PRO .ANN. art. 28.10(a) (Vernon Pamph. Supp.1988), 4 after the court permitted an amendment to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Koller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sodipo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Medrano v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1989
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Sodipo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991