Burke v. State
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentKistler, J.
The majority holds that both the seller and the purchaser on a land sale contract are “owners” for the purposes of Ballot Measure 49. In reaching that conclusion, the majority starts from the proposition, with which I agree, that the definition of “owner” in Measure 49 is ambiguous. It is possible to read that definition either as the seller and the purchaser do (owner includes both the seller and the purchaser) or as the state does (in the context of a land sale contract, owner means only the purchaser). The majority errs, however, in resolving that ambiguity. It appears to derive certainty…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Reedsport v. HUBBARD ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Heider v. DietzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.