Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hupert

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1961No. 30906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Judge.

This is an action in replevin originating in the Magistrate Court of the City of St. Louis. The Magistrate sustained a motion by defendant Leola Moors to dismiss the action, and the plaintiff appealed to the Circuit Court. A like motion was sustained in the Circuit Court, and from the judgment dismissing the case without prejudice the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The action was instituted by filing a “Statement and Affidavit in Replevin” in the Magistrate Court. This statement set forth that the plaintiff was lawfully entitled to possession of a refrigerator wrongfully…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Cooley v. Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Clark v. St. Joseph Terminal RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Thomson v. BastMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Knapp v. CowanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wolf Corporation v. LouisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. In re an Omega Brand: Double Up Queens or Better, Five Card Draw, Electronic Poker Machine, Serial No. 5265Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Byron J. Myers, Inc. v. BradburyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. United Labor Committee of Mo. v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. United Labor Committee of Mo. v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API