Legal Opinion

Carter v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 7, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2022-2801Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARK CARTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-02801-BAH ) Judge Beryl A. Howell ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Mark Carter, a prisoner appearing pro se, has sued the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), alleging that his restricted access to the Trust Fund Limited Inmate Computer System (“TRULINCS”) is arbitrary, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”),

5 U.S.C. § 701

et seq., and violates the U.S. Constitution. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API