Legal Opinion
Rockefeller Foundation v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided July 13, 1932No. Claim No. 22191PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParsons, J.
This claim arises by reason of the filing in this court of an agreed statement of facts under the provisions of section 546 of the Civil Practice Act. Therefore, there is no controversy as to any of the facts. They are all agreed to, the said agreed statement having been signed by Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Webb, attorneys for claimant, and by John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General.
The claim is for $490, the value of certain stamps affixed under protest to certain shares of stock involved in the consolidation of two membership corporations duly incorporated for like purposes and interest on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- White v. Huber Drug Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Phelps-Stokes Estates, Inc. v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Smith v. . BrowningNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- People v. Duffy-McInnerny Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Merchants Nat. Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Koppers Coal & Transportation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Niagara Hudson Power Corporation v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Terminals & Transportation Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1938
- Niagara Hudson Power Corp. v. HoeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940