Legal Opinion
Prieto v. LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 30, 2005No. B172366PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.
The trial court denied appellant’s motion to vacate the judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Rebecca Prieto was working as an assistant bursar for respondent Loyola Marymount University when she developed carpal tunnel syndrome. After respondent made some accommodations for appellant that did not relieve the problem, appellant went on workers’ compensation leave in April 1998. Respondent’s leave policies provided for leaves of absence not to exceed six months, but appellant remained on leave for over three years.
Twice during the year 2000,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Garcia v. HejmadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- English v. Ikon Business Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Generale Bank Nederland, N v. v. Eyes of Beholder Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Avila v. ChuaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Henderson v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Matera v. McLeodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Huh v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Hossain v. HossainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.