Legal Opinion
King v. Barbour
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Erorn the Decatur Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.
— This was a suit by the appellees,as the payees, against the appellants, as the makers, of a promissory note, of which the following is a- copy :
“$929.41. ■ Cincinnati, June 25th, 1872.
“ One day after date, we, the undersigned, residing at Ewing, County of Decatur, State of Indiana, promise to pay to the order of Barbour, Stedman & Herod, nine hundred and twenty-nine and forty-one hundredths dollars, at their office in Cincinnati, Ohio, with interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum after maturity, and attorney’s fees, if employed to collect this note, without any relief whatever from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strough v. GearIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Wolf v. SchofieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Swift v. EllsworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Lamson v. FallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Graham v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boor v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Moore v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Hayden v. CretcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Vannoy v. KleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Lucas v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1884