State v. Scott
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Defendant appeals his convictions for multiple sex offense charges and the two judgments sentencing him as an habitual felon. Defendant requests that this Court review sealed records of counseling and treatment sessions for one of the victims. He also contends that the trial court improperly determined his prior record level. For the reasons stated herein, we find no error.
Defendant was indicted and found guilty by a jury of one count of statutory sex offense and three counts of taking indecent liberties with a child. The victims in each of these cases were defendant’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. EppsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. HagerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Smith v. The BDK Grp. Shallotte, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.