Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Black-Eyed Pea U.S.A., Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided July 15, 1999No. 09-99-029 CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

Betty Duncan appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Black-Eyed Pea U.S.A., Inc. Duncan brings three points of error on appeal.

This appeal arises from a slip-and-fall premises liability lawsuit. Duncan filed suit against Black-Eyed Pea U.S.A., Inc. (Black-Eyed) alleging she was injured when she slipped and fell as a result of a dangerous condition on the floor of a Black-Eyed Pea restaurant in Beaumont, Texas. The court granted Black-Eyed’s summary judgment in accordance with Tex. R. Civ. P. 166(a)(i) and found there was no evidence 1) that Black-Eyed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. GonzalezTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Stoner v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ReeceTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wright v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  3. Brookshire Food Stores, L.L.C. v. Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Reece, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  5. Brookshire Food Stores, L.L.C. v. Katherine Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API