Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Reece

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2002No. 00-1261PublishedCited by 343 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill

To prevail in a premises-liability case, an invitee must prove that the premises owner had actual or constructive knowledge of a dangerous condition on the premises. In this slip-and-fall case, we must decide whether evidence that the premises owner’s employee was in close proximity to the dangerous condition right before the plaintiff fell, without more, is legally sufficient to charge the premises owner with constructive notice. We hold that it is not, absent some evidence demonstrating that the condition existed long enough that the premises owner had a reasonable opportunity to discover…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bradford v. VentoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. GonzalezTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. CMH Homes, Inc. v. DaenenTexas Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by343 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SpatesTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Randy Austin v. Kroger Texas, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. John Sampson v. the University of Texas at AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Pamela McCarty v. Hillstone Restaurant GrouCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

338 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API