Legal Opinion

Highsmith v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 28, 1988No. 70913Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARKETT, Justice.

We have for review Highsmith v. State, 508 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), affirming petitioner’s convictions and sentences and certifying the same question set out in VanTassell v. State, 498 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), quashed, 512 So.2d 181 (Fla. 1987), as a question of great public importance. The certified question is:

Does a trial court’s statement, made at the time of departure from the sentencing guidelines, that it would depart for any one of the reasons given, regardless of whether both valid and invalid reasons are found on review, satisfy the standard set forth…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Griffis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. VanTassell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. VanTassell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Highsmith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API