Legal Opinion

Highsmith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 11, 1987No. BN-495PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. Hester v. State, 503 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). We again certify the questions set out in Mitchell v. State, 507 So.2d 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Fryson v. State, 506 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) and VanTassell v. State, 498 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), as questions of great public importance.

SHIVERS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Fryson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. VanTassell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Hester v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Highsmith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988