Legal Opinion
Highsmith v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 11, 1987No. BN-495PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Appellant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. Hester v. State, 503 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). We again certify the questions set out in Mitchell v. State, 507 So.2d 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Fryson v. State, 506 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) and VanTassell v. State, 498 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), as questions of great public importance.
SHIVERS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Fryson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- VanTassell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Hester v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- Highsmith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988