Legal Opinion
Arrington v. County of Dallas
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided March 29, 1990No. 05-89-00245-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OVARD, Justice.
Floyd D. Arrington (Arrington) appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the County of Dallas (the County) and Constable Jack Richardson (Richardson). All parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion for the County and Richardson, but denied Arring-ton’s. The issues are: (1) whether deputy constables are employees subject to the Dallas County Civil Service Rules and Regulations 1 (the Rules); and (2) whether the County and Richardson are estopped from denying that Arrington was subject to the Rules. Because we hold that deputy…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Hutchins v. PrasifkaTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Christopher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dillard v. Austin Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- County of Dallas v. WilandTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Maguire Oil Co. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- The Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc. v. David Dworkin, David Dworkin v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc., Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Dallas Central Appraisal District v. G.T.E. Directories Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.