Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Joseph Harmon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1980No. 78-3523PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant and a number of co-defendants were charged with distributing cocaine and using a telephone to facilitate the distribution of narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), and 843(b). Appellant failed to appear on the day of trial, and remained a fugitive until after his co-defendants had been convicted. Appellant was then apprehended, tried, and convicted. At both trials, the convictions rested in part upon evidence obtained through use of a wiretap authorized by court order issued pursuant to Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. MandelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Leo BishopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. People v. PensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. United States v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez, United States of America v. Carlos Latorre, United States of America v. Manuel Parrilla-MarquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. David SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API