Legal Opinion

Chesson v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1977No. 7626SC744PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

The judge’s findings of fact are comparable to the verdict of a jury. They are conclusive on appeal if there is any competent evidence to support them. Trust Co. v. Gill, State Treasurer, 286 N.C. 342, 211 S.E. 2d 327.

The note in question was a negotiable instrument and was under seal. The judge was, therefore, faced with a presumption of consideration. The burden of rebutting that presumption was on defendants. Whether defendants carried that burden was for the trier of the facts. Little v. Oil Co., 12 N.C. App. 394, 183 S.E. 2d 290. The weight of the evidence is for the judge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Branch Banking & Trust Company v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Little v. GRUBB OIL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wells v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API