Legal Opinion
Tyson v. Access Services
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 25, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-4653PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Baylson, District Judge.
I.Introduction
In this employment discrimination and retaliation case, plaintiff Beth Tyson (“Ms. Tyson” or “Plaintiff’) alleges that defendant Access Services (“Access” or “Defendant”), her former employer, violated the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA” or the “Act”) by discriminating against her for her association with qualified individuals, as that term is used in the Act, and for retaliation against her. Access has moved to dismiss Ms. Tyson’s complaint in its entirety under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- AKOPIAN v. INSERRA SUPERMARKETSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- BRIDGES v. INDIANAPOLISDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
- CAGNETTI v. JUNIPER VILLAGE AT BENSALEM OPERATIONSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Castro v. Dot's Pretzels, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- Fritz v. Allied Services Foundation d/b/a Allied Services Integrated Health SystemDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.