Legal Opinion

In Re Cornyn

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided September 7, 2000No. 01-00-00758-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRY B. COHEN, Justice.

Relators seek a writ of mandamus, complaining that District Judge Patricia Hancock abused her discretion by granting a temporary restraining order (TRO) against *330them; ordering a show-cause hearing against relators Cornyn and Maddox for contempt for violating the TRO; holding relators Lockhoof and Acker in contempt for violating the TRO; and setting a temporary injunction hearing. We conditionally grant the writ.

Background

The real parties in interest are Monetiz-eMedia.com (Monetize), Danny Michael Beavers, Donald Mark Beavers, Roy W. Weisner, and Robert W.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Curtis v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Re Union Pacific Resources Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Texas Liquor Control Board v. Canyon Creek Land Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hardy v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  3. Potter County Attorney's Office v. Stars & Stripes Sweepstakes, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
  4. Texas Department of Public Safety v. LaFleur, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  5. in Re: Sierra Club, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API