Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony Como
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 26, 1965No. 311, Docket 29093PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal turns on whether the Distinct Coux*t was justified in denying defendant Como’s pretrial motion, under Rule 41(e) (1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to suppress evidence seized dui'ing an allegedly illegal search. Como was convicted, after a jury trial, for violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174, by receiving, concealing, and facilitating the transportation and concealment of illegally impoiTed heroin. The statutory mandatory minimum five-year sentence was imposed. Having concluded that the trial court erred in not suppressing the nax'coties, which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- The United States of America v. Louis C. Viale, Marino J. Faliero, Sr., Joseph S. Pinnavia, Louis a.abbonando, Anthony F. Fino and Nicholas S. LongoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Ruth SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Robert Edgar Channel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. Robert William Gorman and Edward Terrence RocheCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Gordon R. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. LopezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- United States v. Lloyd Nelson JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.