Legal Opinion

M. P. R'y Co. v. Rountree

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1884No. 1755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Smith County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 387. Bill of exceptions to evidence must show ground of objection made; declarations of agent to prove agency, admissible ivhen; case stated. Appellee, who is a physician and surgeon, sued appellant to recover for professional services rendered by him to one Copeland, an employee of appellant, whose leg' had been broken while in the service of appellant. Appellee recovered judgment for the amount of his demand. The first error assigned by appellant relates to the testimony of appellee Rountree, that Dr. Hunter, who employed him to attend upon Copeland, stated to him at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Bodman v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tubbs v. KleekIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Sponaugle v. WarnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API