Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
.On Rehearing.
YOUNG, Justice.
Upon careful study of the record, appel-lee’s motion for rehearing must be sustained. In lieu of our original opinion remanding this cause, the following will be substituted as our opinion of affirmance, Mr. BOND, Chief Justice, dissenting:
This is a compensation suit under sec. 12, Art. 8306, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.; ap-pellee Davis alleging in trial pleading that about January 1, 1944, while employed by the De George Cafe, Dallas, as a “pot washer,” some lye-water splashed into his left eye, resulting in total and permanent loss of use of said member; also partial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Petroleum Casualty Co. v. WilliamsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Travelers' Ins. v. RichmondTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. MundayTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. DrummondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Traders & General Insurance v. BulisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.