Legal Opinion

Travelers' Ins. v. Richmond

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1927No. 915—4682PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

The opinion of the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals is reported in 284 S. W. 698. The evidence touching the more important issues is there fully stated, except that reference to the testimony of Dr. Bruce Richardson, an “eye specialist” and witness for the insurer, is omitted. He testified in substance that he made various examinations of Richmond’s eye, etc. (one of which was on August 8, 1922, and another in January, 1923), and found “there was no impairment whatever of the vision with glasses.” Dr. Miller, whose testimony is excerpted in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. East Texas Fire Insurance v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kelley v. ProutyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. ThrashCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Graf v. National Steel Products Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API