Legal Opinion

Cleaveland v. Gannon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 22, 2008No. S08G0721, S08G0713PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLEY, Justice.

In June of 2000, William Gannon underwent an appendectomy. In connection with that procedure, a CT scan was performed which showed two masses in his left kidney. Urinalysis also revealed that he had microscopic hematuria, which is blood in the urine that is only visible with a microscope. He was referred to Dr. Lynwood Cleave-land for urological consultation. Dr. Cleaveland told Mr. Gannon that he had a small cyst in his kidney which was common and did not need treatment, but that he should see his primary care physician regarding the hematuria.

When Mr. Gannon followed up with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. ZirkleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Kaminer v. CanasSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Amu v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  4. Walker v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Savannah Valley Production Credit Ass'n v. CheekSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF VALDOSTA/LOWNDES COUNTY D/B/A SOUTH GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER v. DENNIS H. FENDERCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Department of Public Safety v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  3. Smith v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. McCord v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  5. Franklin v. EavesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API