Legal Opinion
Richard Lee Ingle v. Cletus J. Fitzharris, Superintendent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1967No. 21093_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Appellant’s petition for habeas corpus alleged that essential elements of due process were lacking in the state prosecution leading to his conviction. The district court dismissed the petition on the ground that the state trial record conclusively demonstrated that appellant was not entitled to relief. We reverse.
1. Appellant complained that he was not accorded his due process right to an attorney’s “effective aid in the preparation and trial of the case.” Powell v. State of Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 71, [53 S.Ct. 55, 65, 77 L.Ed. 158] (1932). He alleged that he had no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Edward Morgan MacKenna v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ronald Maynard v. Larry MeachumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- State v. BurriWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Ingle v. FitzharrisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968
- Richard Lee Ingle v. Cletus J. FitzharrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- George Albert Curry v. Lawrence E. Wilson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.