Gamble v. State

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

A judge, sitting without a jury, found David Gamble guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol. Gamble appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction, the admission of similar transaction evidence and the lawfulness of the police roadblock at which he was stopped. The challenges are without merit, and we therefore affirm Gamble’s conviction.

1. On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict and the appellant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence; moreover, this…