Legal Opinion

Stilp v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Gene Stilp (Stilp) has filed an amended petition for review in this court’s original jurisdiction, alleging in Count XII that the General Assembly has violated Article VIII, Section 14 of the Pennsylvania Constitution by maintaining legislative leadership accounts. 1 Respondents have filed answers to the amended petition, setting forth new matter. Stilp has responded to the new matter, and Respondents now apply for summary relief in the nature of judgment on the pleadings. 2

Pa. R.A.P. 1532(b) provides that, at any time after the filing of a petition for review in an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stilp v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Parish v. HornCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Parish v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Jubelirer v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stilp v. COM., GENERAL ASSEMBLYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Robert M. McCord, in his official capacity as the Treasurer of the Commonwealth of PA v. Pennsylvanians for Union Reform, and Simon Campbell, PresidentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. D.A. Bell, Sr. v. PBPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. K.B. v. Delaware County Office of Judicial Support, and Mary J. Walk, in her official capacity as Director of the Delaware County Office of Judicial SupportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. R. McCord v. Pennsylvanians for Union Reform, and S. Campbell, PresidentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API