Legal Opinion
In Re: World War II Era Japanese Forced Labor
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 17, 2001No. MDL-1347. Nos. 99-5309, 99-5303, 00-3752, 00-3242, 00-3586, 00-2358, 01-2592PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
164 F.Supp.2d 1160 (2001)
In re WORLD WAR II ERA JAPANESE FORCED LABOR LITIGATION.
This Document Relates To:
Choe
v.
Nippon Steel Corp, et al.,
Kim
v.
Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., et al.,
Oh
v.
Mitsui & Co., Ltd., et al.,
Sin
v.
Mitsui & Co., Ltd., et al.,
Su
v.
Mitsubishi Corp., et al.,
Sung, et al.
v.
Mitsubishi Corp, et al.,
Ma
v.
Kajima Corp., et al.
No. MDL-1347. Nos. 99-5309, 99-5303, 00-3752, 00-3242, 00-3586, 00-2358, 01-2592.
United States District Court, N.D. California.
September 17, 2001.
William S. Lerach, Frank J. Janecek, Elizabeth J. Arleo, Patrick W. Daniels, Milberg Weiss Bershad…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Deutsch v. Turner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Papa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Papa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- John Roe I v. Bridgestone Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.