Legal Opinion

United States v. Quadro Corp.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided April 22, 1996No. Civil Action 1:96CV38PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION

HEARTFIELD, District Judge.

Plaintiff, United States of America, petitions for injunctive relief under 18 U.S.C. § 1345. Plaintiff alleges that the defendants are engaged in a mail and wire fraud scheme to defraud numerous consumers. This alleged scheme involves the sale of a device, known generally as the Quadro Tracker, which is marketed and distributed to law enforcement agencies, correctional institutions, and school systems, as well as to the general public through false and misleading representations concerning its remote sensing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Connell v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Anthony MateriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. William Sheiner and Victor Piacentile, A/K/A Victor PeaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. FangDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  2. United States v. Chung's Products LPDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  3. United States v. TravalinoDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API