Legal Opinion
United States v. Fang
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 12, 1996No. Civil PJM 96-2354PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSITTE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On July 29, 1996, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1345(a), the United States filed a Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Motion for Temporary and Preliminary Injunctive Relief against Defendants Mary H. Fang, M.D. and her husband Peter Chang. The Government alleges that Defendants are engaged in an ongoing or likely to reoccur scheme to defraud health care insurers in the submission of claims for reimbursement for medical services and supplies in violation of the federal mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Among other things, the Government…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. SriramDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- Red Wolf Coalition v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- United States v. Narco Freedom, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.