Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Hydraulic Building Stone Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Tarrant County. Tried below before Hon. B. H. Buck.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, Chief Justice.

— The building stone company was a corporation under the laws of Texas. As such it undertook by its contract in writing, dated September 26, 1906, in consideration of $2,500 to be paid to it by Mitchell, to furnish material therefor and to “well and sufficiently perform and finish” for Mitchell, under the direction and to the satisfaction of his architects, “all the work included in. the excavating, grading, cement floors, brick work, concrete blocks and footings ... of the two story and basement residence” to be constructed for said Mitchell. To secure the performance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Kurtz v. ForquerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Ramsey v. Tod, Secretary of StateTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. St. Louis Brewing Ass'n v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
  5. Smith v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1849

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Phelps v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Backus v. FeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. La Belle Iron Works v. Quarter Savings BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Star Grocery Co. v. BradfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Tolbert v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API