Legal Opinion

Worman v. Columbia County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 15, 2008No. 052504; A136006PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

After discovering damage to the trees and shrubs on their property, plaintiffs Kathleen and Jeffrey Worman brought inverse condemnation, negligence, and timber trespass claims against defendant Columbia County based on allegations that the damage resulted from herbicide sprayed by county personnel. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the county, and plaintiffs appeal. We affirm the judgment as to the inverse condemnation claim but reverse and remand as to the negligence and timber trespass claims.

We state the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the nonmoving…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Adams v. Oregon State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Forest Grove Brick Works, Inc. v. StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Broughton Lumber Co. v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Dial Temporary Help Service, Inc. v. DLF International Seeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Hayes Oyster Co. v. DEQCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Cruze v. HudlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API