Cruze v. Hudler
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Plaintiffs brought this action against two defendants, Martin L. Hudler and Charles R. Markley, who allegedly defrauded them by means of an investment scheme. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Markley on all of plaintiffs’ claims, and refused to allow plaintiffs to amend their complaint to allege a racketeering claim against either defendant. Plaintiffs now appeal, arguing that the court erred in granting Markley’s motion for summary judgment and in denying plaintiffs’ motions to amend their complaint. We agree with plaintiffs in both respects, and we therefore reverse and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Howard v. America Online Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Granewich v. HardingOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Reynolds v. SchrockOregon Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bates v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Great American Insurance v. LindermanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Cruze v. HudlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Butters v. The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Lake v. EspositoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024