Legal Opinion

Mollie B. v. Maurice B.

New York City Family Court

Decided July 10, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNanette Dembitz, J.

The question of law in this proceeding is whether this court should enforce an order for alimony issued by a court of another State merely as a “ temporary ’ ’ order. No final adjudication or final order has been entered in the divorce proceeding commenced by petitioner wife against respondent husband in Florida. However, petitioner secured an order for temporary alimony of $250 a week in her Florida proceeding. Bight months thereafter, respondent having left Florida for New York, she filed a petition under subdivision (c) of section 466 of the Family Court Act for enforcement of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Sutton v. LeibSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Light v. LightIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Duss v. DussSupreme Court of Florida · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schapiro v. SchapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Mary F.B. v. David B.New York City Family Court · 1982
  3. Rockland County Department of Social Services v. DeCarloNew York City Family Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API