Mollie B. v. Maurice B.
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtNanette Dembitz, J.
The question of law in this proceeding is whether this court should enforce an order for alimony issued by a court of another State merely as a “ temporary ’ ’ order. No final adjudication or final order has been entered in the divorce proceeding commenced by petitioner wife against respondent husband in Florida. However, petitioner secured an order for temporary alimony of $250 a week in her Florida proceeding. Bight months thereafter, respondent having left Florida for New York, she filed a petition under subdivision (c) of section 466 of the Family Court Act for enforcement of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sutton v. LeibSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Light v. LightIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Duss v. DussSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schapiro v. SchapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Mary F.B. v. David B.New York City Family Court · 1982
- Rockland County Department of Social Services v. DeCarloNew York City Family Court · 1989