Legal Opinion

Einolf v. Thomson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1905No. Nos. 14,379—(137)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action in the district court for Clay county to recover $1,360, with interest, for services rendered as a household servant. The case was (tried before Baxter, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor •of plaintiff for the sum demanded. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

In this case plaintiff sued for personal services as a household ser-vant, claimed to have been rendered by her to defendant. The an*231swer was to the effect that, during all the times specified in the complaint, plaintiff lived in defendant’s home, and occupied the position and relation to him of a daughter, and that all services performed by her for him were rendered gratuitously. Trial by jury resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial, defendant appeals.

1. The testimony shows conclusively that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. PattersonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  2. Wetherill v. CanneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Donahue v. DonahueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thysell v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Stewart v. . WyrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Beneke v. Estate of BenekeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Klessig v. LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Knight v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API