Rasmussen v. Hancock Cty. Commrs., 5-06-54 (5-27-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, the Hancock County Commissioners, appeals the judgment of the Hancock County Court of Common Pleas denying their motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff-Appellees, Julie Rasmussen, individually and as parent and next friend of Angela Rasmussen and Crystal Rasmussen. On appeal, the Hancock County Commissioners contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment because there are no genuine issues of material fact as to whether they negligently maintained a bridge and as to whether they are immune from civil liability. Finding…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Hubbell v. City of XeniaOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- Diamond Wine & Spirits, Inc. v. Dayton Heidelberg Distributing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kinstle v. JennisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2008