Legal Opinion

Brewerton v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 14, 1935No. M — 333PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHALEY, Judge.

This is a suit for the recovery of income and profits taxes for 1918. The present plaintiffs are the receivers for the corpora tion which succeeded to the interests of the corporation in existence at the time the returns hereinafter referred to were filed, hut for convenience and simplicity of discussion the name "plaintiff” will be used indiscriminately as referring to the foregoing parties. In short, the facts may be stated as follows:

Plaintiff duly filed returns for 1917,1918, 1919, and 1920 and paid the tax shown to be due thereon. In 1921 the Commissioner audited the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Bowers, Collector of Internal Revenue v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co. Same v. Seaman. Same v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States v. John Barth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Mahoning Inv. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Union Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Crossett Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  4. Grand Central Public Market, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
  5. Heinemann Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API