Legal Opinion
Carmacks Collision, Inc. v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 1, 2004No. Docket No. 246172PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, J.
The sole issue presented in this case is whether an unsuccessful bidder for a municipal con*208tract for vehicle repair can challenge the process by which the bid was rejected on the basis of the “fair and just treatment” clause of the Michigan Constitution. That protection applies only to “legislative and executive investigations.” We conclude that the bid process at issue here was not an investigation and affirm the lower court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Defendant city of Detroit sent out requests for bids and quotations on contracts for various…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Mahaffey v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Johnson v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Badiee v. Brighton Area SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- By Lo Oil Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Groves v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Moses, Inc v. Southeast Michigan Council of GovernmentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Carmacks Collision, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004