Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Freidenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 23, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 6, 1995, which, inter alia, assessed Limousine Resources Management Corporation for additional unemployment insurance contributions.
Claimant worked as a limousine driver for Limousine Resources Management Corporation (hereinafter LRM) for approximately 3½ years until June 1992. Contrary to LRM’s contention, the determination by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant, and others similarly situated, were LRM’s employees is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of O’Connor [Howell—Hartnett],…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re the Claim of O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re the Claims of MiddletownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re Hector Taxi Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re the Claim of Chauffeurs Unlimited, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of KidderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re Spectacular Limo Link, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Automotive Service Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008