Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Boydstun

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1941No. 30093PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This action was commenced by defendants in error, as plainr tiffs below, against the plaintiff in error, herein referred to as defendant, to recover damages for the destruction and injury to plaintiff’s orchard, containing approximately 17 acres of peach, cherry, and plum trees, and blackberry vines, located on plaintiff’s farm one-half mile south of Fort Gibson, Muskogee county, Okla., resulting from a fire set by a locomotive of defendant’s train. The cause was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $1,350. The court overruled defendant’s motion for a new trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barker v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Pace v. OttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cities Service Gas Company v. ChristianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Chase v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. Patricia W. Bingham v. Russell Bridges, A/K/A Leon RussellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Schmailzl v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF BOADSNebraska Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API