Legal Opinion
Kenro, Inc. v. Fax Daily, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided November 8, 1995No. IP 95-1077 C B/SPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
BARKER, Chief Judge.
This is before the Court on plaintiff Kenro Inc.’s (“Kenro”) Motion to Remand. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion to Remand is DENIED.
I. Background
On July 14, 1995, Kenro filed a Class Action Complaint in the Marion Superior Court alleging that Defendants Fax Daily, Inc. (“Fax Daily”) and Huntington National Bank of Indiana d/b/a/ Huntington Banks (“Huntington”) violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227. On August 14, 1995, Huntington, with the consent of Fax Daily, removed this action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jane Doe v. Allied-Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Gnb Battery Technologies, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Gnb, Incorporated and Gnb Industrial Battery Company v. Gould, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- International Science & Technology Institute, Incorporated v. Inacom Communications, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Chair King, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Houston Cellular Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Karen Laake, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Kenro, Inc. v. Fax Daily, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
- John J. Murphey, an Individual v. Warren Lanier, an Individual Rjd Enterprises, a Partnership Opinion Does, 1-5Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Nicholson v. Hooters of Augusta, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.