Legal Opinion

United States v. Phare

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 17, 1972No. 24,318PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*245Opinion of the Court

Duncan, Judge:

The appellant was convicted by general court-martial of one specification alleging the violation of a lawful general regulation, by having in his possession a hypodermic needle — Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and total forfeitures. The convening authority approved the findings and only so much of the sentence as provides for a bad-conduct discharge and forfeiture of $50.00 per month for six months. We granted review on the following issue:

Whether appellant suffered manifest prejudice…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  2. United States v. YergerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. ValenciaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. EllseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  5. United States v. WellsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. AsfeldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. MohrUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. PereiraU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. YoungU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. HallU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API