Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 15, 1989No. ACMR 8701758PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND

GILLEY, Judge:

On 17 February 1988, this court affirmed the findings of guilty of two specifications of wrongful distribution of cocaine, one specification of wrongful possession of cocaine, and four specifications of failure to repair in violation of Articles 112a and 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a and 886 (1982 & Supp. II 1984). We also affirmed the sentence of a dishonorable discharge and total forfeitures, but we affirmed only fifteen of the thirty years of confinement, as appropriate in this case.

*788I. Uncharged Misconduct

In his petition…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. WingartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. MartinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HollingsworthU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  2. United States v. StoneU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. GreenU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  4. United States v. MalhiotUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API