United States v. Hall
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND
GILLEY, Judge:
On 17 February 1988, this court affirmed the findings of guilty of two specifications of wrongful distribution of cocaine, one specification of wrongful possession of cocaine, and four specifications of failure to repair in violation of Articles 112a and 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a and 886 (1982 & Supp. II 1984). We also affirmed the sentence of a dishonorable discharge and total forfeitures, but we affirmed only fifteen of the thirty years of confinement, as appropriate in this case.
*788I. Uncharged Misconduct
In his petition…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. WingartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. MartinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. HollingsworthU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. StoneU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. GreenU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. MalhiotUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004