Legal Opinion

MacKay v. St. Charles Medical Center

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1991No. 88-CV-0269 WE; CA A60503; 88-CV-0151 WE; CA A60509; 87-CV-0133 JC; CA A60510; 88-CV-0266 MS; CA A60511; 88-CV-0193 TM; CA A60512; 88-CV-0263 MS; CA A60513Published

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions were patients or are the personal representatives or spouses of patients who received radiation treatment for cancer at defendant St. Charles Medical Center (hospital). Defendant Comerford is a radiation oncologist who administered radiation treatments at the hospital. Defendants Northwest Medical Physics Center and McGreevey (defendants) provided medical physicist services to the hospital between 1982 and 1986. It was defendants’ responsibility to calibrate and make routine checks of the calibration of the hospital’s radiation treatment machinery.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bremner Ex Rel. Bremner v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API