Legal Opinion

Gappelberg v. Landrum

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1984No. C-2389PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILGARLIN, Justice.

This case presents an issue previously undecided in Texas, or for that matter, any other American jurisdiction. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, does the seller have the right to cure a substantial defect by making a replacement of the product after the buyer has revoked acceptance?

On September 5, 1980, Petitioner, Nathan Gappelberg, purchased a large screen Advent television set from Respondent, Neely Landrum, doing business as The Video Station. Gappelberg gave as consideration for the new set $2,231.25 cash and was allowed a $1,500 credit on the trade-in of his old…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  2. Zabriskie Chevrolet, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Jensen v. Seigel Mobile Homes GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Linscott v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  5. Gappelberg v. Landrum, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Head v. Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. City Nat. Bank of Charleston v. WellsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. U.S. Roofing, Inc. v. Credit Alliance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Accettura v. Vacationland, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Equistar Chemicals, LP v. Clydeunion DB, Limited, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API